Method and apparatus for treating a joint, including the treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in a hip joint and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement in a hip joint

ABSTRACT

A computer visual guidance system for guiding a surgeon through an arthroscopic debridement of a bony pathology, wherein the computer visual guidance system is configured to: (i) receive a 2D image of the bony pathology from a source; (ii) automatically analyze the 2D image so as to determine at least one measurement with respect to the bony pathology; (iii) automatically annotate the 2D image with at least one annotation relating to the at least one measurement determined with respect to the bony pathology so as to create an annotated 2D image; and (iv) display the annotated 2D image to the surgeon so as to guide the surgeon through the arthroscopic debridement of the bony pathology.

REFERENCE TO PENDING PRIOR PATENT APPLICATION

This patent application claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional PatentApplication Ser. No. 62/423,890, filed Nov. 18, 2016, by Stryker Corp.and Brian Fouts et al. for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING A JOINT,INCLUDING THE TREATMENT OF CAM-TYPE FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT IN AHIP JOINT AND PINCER-TYPE FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT IN A HIP JOINT,which patent application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to surgical methods and apparatus in general, andmore particularly to surgical methods and apparatus for treating a hipjoint.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The hip joint movably connects the leg to the torso. The hip joint is aball-and-socket joint, and is capable of a wide range of differentmotions, e.g., flexion and extension, abduction and adduction, internaland external rotation, etc. See FIGS. 1A-1D. With the possible exceptionof the shoulder joint, the hip joint is perhaps the most mobile joint inthe body. Significantly, and unlike the shoulder joint, the hip jointcarries substantial weight loads during most of the day, in both static(e.g., standing and sitting) and dynamic (e.g., walking and running)conditions.

The hip joint is susceptible to a number of different pathologies. Thesepathologies can have both congenital and injury-related origins. In somecases, the pathology can be substantial at the outset. In other cases,the pathology may be minor at the outset but, if left untreated, mayworsen over time. More particularly, in many cases an existing pathologymay be exacerbated by the dynamic nature of the hip joint and thesubstantial weight loads imposed on the hip joint.

The pathology may, either initially or thereafter, significantlyinterfere with patient comfort and lifestyle. In some cases thepathology may be so severe as to require partial or total hipreplacement. A number of procedures have been developed for treating hippathologies short of partial or total hip replacement, but theseprocedures are generally limited in scope due to the significantdifficulties associated with treating the hip joint.

A better understanding of various hip joint pathologies, and also thecurrent limitations associated with their treatment, can be gained froma more precise understanding of the anatomy of the hip joint.

Anatomy Of The Hip Joint

The hip joint is formed at the junction of the femur and the hip. Moreparticularly, and looking now at FIG. 2, the ball of the femur isreceived in the acetabular cup of the hip, with a plurality of ligamentsand other soft tissue serving to hold the bones in articulatingcondition.

As seen in FIG. 3, the femur is generally characterized by an elongatedbody terminating, at its top end, in an angled neck which supports ahemispherical head (also sometimes referred to as the ball). As seen inFIGS. 3 and 4, a large projection known as the greater trochanterprotrudes laterally and posteriorly from the elongated body adjacent tothe neck. A second, somewhat smaller projection known as the lessertrochanter protrudes medially and posteriorly from the elongated bodyadjacent to the neck. An intertrochanteric crest extends along theperiphery of the femur, between the greater trochanter and the lessertrochanter.

Looking next at FIG. 5, the hip is made up of three constituent bones:the ilium, the ischium and the pubis. These three bones cooperate withone another (they typically ossify into a single “hip bone” structure bythe age of 25) so as to form the acetabular cup. The acetabular cupreceives the head of the femur.

Both the head of the femur and the acetabular cup are covered with alayer of articular cartilage which protects the underlying bone andfacilitates motion. See FIG. 6.

Various ligaments and soft tissue serve to hold the ball of the femur inplace within the acetabular cup. More particularly, and looking now atFIGS. 7 and 8, the ligamentum teres extends between the ball of thefemur and the base of the acetabular cup. As seen in FIG. 9, a labrum isdisposed about the perimeter of the acetabular cup. The labrum serves toincrease the depth of the acetabular cup and effectively establishes asuction seal between the ball of the femur and the rim of the acetabularcup, thereby helping to hold the head of the femur in the acetabularcup. In addition, and looking now at FIG. 10, a fibrous capsule extendsbetween the neck of the femur and the rim of the acetabular cup,effectively sealing off the ball-and-socket members of the hip jointfrom the remainder of the body. The foregoing structures are encompassedand reinforced by a set of three main ligaments (i.e., the iliofemoralligament, the ischiofemoral ligament and the pubofemoral ligament) whichextend between the femur and the hip. See FIGS. 11 and 12.

Pathologies Of The Hip Joint

As noted above, the hip joint is susceptible to a number of differentpathologies. These pathologies can have both congenital andinjury-related origins.

By way of example but not limitation, one important type of congenitalpathology of the hip joint involves impingement between the neck of thefemur and the rim of the acetabular cup. In some cases, and looking nowat FIG. 13, this impingement can occur due to irregularities in thegeometry of the femur. This type of impingement is sometimes referred toas a cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (i.e., a cam-type FAI). Inother cases, and looking now at FIG. 14, the impingement can occur dueto irregularities in the geometry of the acetabular cup. This lattertype of impingement is sometimes referred to as a pincer-typefemoroacetabular impingement (i.e., a pincer-type FAI). Impingement canresult in a reduced range of motion, substantial pain and, in somecases, significant deterioration of the hip joint.

By way of further example but not limitation, another important type ofcongenital pathology of the hip joint involves defects in the articularsurface of the ball and/or the articular surface of the acetabular cup.Defects of this type sometimes start out fairly small but often increasein size over time, generally due to the dynamic nature of the hip jointand also due to the weight-bearing nature of the hip joint. Articulardefects can result in substantial pain, induce or exacerbate arthriticconditions and, in some cases, cause significant deterioration of thehip joint.

By way of further example but not limitation, one important type ofinjury-related pathology of the hip joint involves trauma to the labrum.More particularly, in many cases, an accident or a sports-related injurycan result in the labrum being torn, typically with a tear runningthrough the body of the labrum. See FIG. 15. These types of injuries canbe painful for the patient and, if left untreated, can lead tosubstantial deterioration of the hip joint.

The General Trend Toward Treating Joint Pathologies UsingMinimally-Invasive, and Earlier, Interventions

The current trend in orthopedic surgery is to treat joint pathologiesusing minimally-invasive techniques. By way of example but notlimitation, it is common to re-attach ligaments in the shoulder jointusing minimally-invasive, “keyhole” techniques which do not require“laying open” the capsule of the shoulder joint. By way of furtherexample but not limitation, it is common to repair torn meniscalcartilage in the knee joint, and/or to replace ruptured ACL ligaments inthe knee joint, using minimally-invasive techniques. While suchminimally-invasive approaches can require additional training on thepart of the surgeon, such procedures generally offer substantialadvantages for the patient and have now become the standard of care formany shoulder joint and knee joint pathologies.

In addition to the foregoing, due to the widespread availability ofminimally-invasive approaches for treating pathologies of the shoulderjoint and knee joint, the current trend is to provide such treatmentmuch earlier in the lifecycle of the pathology, so as to address patientpain as soon as possible and so as to minimize any exacerbation of thepathology itself. This is in marked contrast to traditional surgicalpractices, which have generally dictated postponing surgical proceduresas long as possible so as to spare the patient from the substantialtrauma generally associated with invasive surgery.

Treatment for Pathologies of the Hip Joint

Unfortunately, minimally-invasive treatments for pathologies of the hipjoint have lagged behind minimally-invasive treatments for pathologiesof the shoulder joint and knee joint. This is generally due to (i) thegeometry of the hip joint itself, and (ii) the nature of the pathologieswhich must typically be addressed in the hip joint.

More particularly, the hip joint is generally considered to be a “tight”joint, in the sense that there is relatively little room to maneuverwithin the confines of the joint itself. This is in marked contrast tothe knee joint, which is generally considered to be relatively spaciouswhen compared to the hip joint. As a result, it is relatively difficultfor surgeons to perform minimally-invasive procedures on the hip joint.

Furthermore, the natural pathways for entering the interior of the hipjoint (i.e., the pathways which naturally exist between adjacent bones)are generally much more constraining for the hip joint than for theshoulder joint or the knee joint. This limited access furthercomplicates effectively performing minimally-invasive procedures on thehip joint.

In addition to the foregoing, the nature and location of the pathologiesof the hip joint also complicate performing minimally-invasiveprocedures. By way of example but not limitation, consider a typicaltear of the labrum in the hip joint. In this situation, instruments mustgenerally be introduced into the joint space using a line of approachwhich is set, in some locations, at an angle of 25 degrees or more tothe line of repair. This makes drilling into bone, for example, muchmore complex than where the line of approach is effectively aligned withthe line of repair, such as is frequently the case in the shoulderjoint. Furthermore, the working space within the hip joint is typicallyextremely limited, further complicating repairs where the line ofapproach is not aligned with the line of repair.

As a result of the foregoing, minimally-invasive hip joint proceduresare still relatively difficult, and patients must frequently managetheir hip joint pathologies for as long as possible, until a partial ortotal hip replacement can no longer be avoided, whereupon the procedureis generally done as a highly-invasive, open procedure, with all of thedisadvantages associated with highly-invasive, open procedures.

As a result, there is a pressing need for improved methods and apparatusfor repairing the hip joint.

Issues Relating to the Treatment of Cam-Type FemoroacetabularImpingement

As noted above, hip arthroscopy is becoming increasingly more common inthe diagnosis and treatment of various hip pathologies. However, due tothe anatomy of the hip joint and the pathologies associated with thesame, hip arthroscopy is currently practical for only selectedpathologies and, even then, hip arthroscopy has generally met withlimited success.

One procedure which is sometimes attempted arthroscopically relates tofemoral debridement for treatment of cam-type femoroacetabularimpingement (i.e., cam-type FAI). More particularly, with cam-typefemoroacetabular impingement, irregularities in the geometry of thefemur can lead to impingement between the femur and the rim of theacetabular cup. Treatment for cam-type femoroacetabular impingementtypically involves debriding the femoral neck and/or head, usinginstruments such as burrs and osteotomes, to remove the bony deformitiescausing the impingement. In this respect it should be appreciated thatit is important to debride the femur carefully, since only bone whichdoes not conform to the desired geometry should be removed, in order toensure positive results as well as to minimize the possibility of bonefracture after treatment.

For this reason, when debridement is performed as an open surgicalprocedure, surgeons generally use debridement templates having apre-shaped curvature to guide them in removing the appropriate amount ofbone from the femur.

However, when the debridement procedure is attempted arthroscopically,conventional debridement templates with their pre-shaped curvaturecannot be passed through the narrow keyhole incisions, and hencedebridement templates are generally not available to guide the surgeonin reshaping the bone surface. As a result, the debridement mustgenerally be effected “freehand.” In addition to the foregoing, the viewof the cam pathology is also generally limited. Primarily, the surgeonuses a scope and camera to view the resection area, but the scope imagehas a limited field of view and is somewhat distorted. Also, because thescope is placed close to the bone surface, the surgeon cannot view theentire pathology “all at once.” Secondarily, the surgeon also utilizes afluoroscope to take X-ray images of the anatomy. These X-ray imagessupplement the arthroscopic view from the scope, but it is still limitedto a 2D representation of the 3D cam pathology.

As a result of the foregoing, it is generally quite difficult for thesurgeon to determine exactly how much bone should be removed, andwhether the shape of the remaining bone has the desired geometry. Inpractice, surgeons tend to err on the side of caution and remove lessbone. Significantly, under-resection of the cam pathology is the leadingcause of revision hip arthroscopy.

Accordingly, a primary object of the present invention is to provide thesurgeon with a novel method and apparatus for guiding the surgeon duringan arthroscopic debridement procedure to treat cam-type femoroacetabularimpingement.

Issues Relating to the Treatment of Pincer-Type FemoroacetabularImpingement

Another procedure which is sometimes attempted arthroscopically relatesto treatment of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (i.e.,pincer-type FAI). More particularly, with pincer-type femoroacetabularimpingement, irregularities in the geometry of the acetabulum can leadto impingement between the femur and the rim of the acetabular cup.Treatment for pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement typicallyinvolves debriding the rim of the acetabular cup using instruments suchas burrs and osteotomes to remove the bony deformities causing theimpingement. In some cases, the labrum is released from the acetabularbone so as to expose the underlying rim of the acetabular cup prior todebriding the rim of the acetabular cup, and then the labrum isreattached to the debrided rim of the acetabular cup. In this respect itshould be appreciated that it is important to debride the rim of theacetabular cup carefully, since only bone which does not conform to thedesired geometry should be removed, in order to alleviate impingementwhile minimizing the possibility of removing too much bone from the rimof the acetabular cup, which could cause joint instability.

However, when the debridement procedure is attempted arthroscopically,the debridement must generally be effected freehand. In this setting, itis generally quite difficult for the surgeon to determine exactly howmuch bone should be removed, and whether the remaining bone has thedesired geometry. In practice, surgeons tend to err on the side ofcaution and remove less bone. Significantly, under-resection of thepincer pathology may necessitate revision hip arthroscopy.

Accordingly, another object of the present invention is to provide thesurgeon with a novel method and apparatus for guiding the surgeon duringan arthroscopic debridement procedure to treat pincer-typefemoroacetabular impingement.

Alpha Angle and Center Edge Angle Measurements

Two common anatomical measurements used in diagnosing femoroacetabularimpingement (FAI) are the Alpha Angle (FIG. 16) for cam-type impingementand the Center Edge Angle (FIG. 17) for pincer-type impingement. Thesemeasurements are typically measured from pre-operative images (e.g.,pre-operative X-ray images). These measurements are used to determinethe degree to which the patient's hip anatomy deviates from normal,healthy hip anatomy.

For example, a healthy hip typically has an Alpha Angle of anywhere fromless than approximately 42 degrees to approximately 50 degrees; thus, apatient with an Alpha Angle of greater than approximately 42 degrees toapproximately 50 degrees may be a candidate for FAI surgery. During aninitial examination of a patient, the surgeon will typically take anX-ray of the patient's hip. If the patient has an initial diagnosis ofFAI, the patient may also obtain an MRI or CT scan of their hip forfurther evaluation of the bony pathology causing the FAI.

Most of today's imaging techniques (e.g., X-ray, CT, MRI) are digital,and hence the images can be imported into, and manipulated by, computersoftware. Using the imported digital images, the surgeon is able tomeasure the Alpha Angle (and/or the Center Edge Angle). For example, thesurgeon imports the digital image into one of the many availablesoftware programs that use the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communicationsin Medicine) standard for medical imaging. In order to make the AlphaAngle (or the Center Edge Angle) measurements with the digital image,the surgeon must first manually create and overlay geometric shapes ontothe digital medical image.

For example, and looking now at FIG. 16, to measure the Alpha Angle, thesurgeon manually creates a circle 5 and places it over the femoral head10, and then manually sizes the circle such that the edge of the circlematches the edge of the femoral head. The surgeon then manually createsa line 15 and places it along the mid-line of the femoral neck 20. Thesurgeon then manually draws a second line 25 which originates at thecenter of the femoral head and passes through the location whichsignifies the start of the cam pathology 30 (i.e., the location wherethe bone first extends outside the circle set around the femoral head).The surgeon then manually selects the two lines and instructs thesoftware to calculate the angle between the two lines; the result is theAlpha Angle 35.

Correspondingly, and looking now at FIG. 17, to measure the Center EdgeAngle, the surgeon manually creates a vertical line 40 which originatesat the center of the femoral head, and then manually draws a second line45 which originates at the center of the femoral head and passes throughthe location which signifies the start of the pincer pathology 50 (i.e.,the rim of the acetabular cup). The surgeon then manually selects thetwo lines and instructs the software to calculate the angle between thetwo lines; the result is the Center Edge Angle 55.

With 3D medical images (e.g., CT, MRI, etc.), the surgeon can positionone or more planes through the femoral head, and then performs the sameoperations within the one or more planes to measure the Alpha Angle fora given plane.

These Alpha Angle measurements (or Center Edge Angle measurements) aretypically performed around the time that the patient is initiallyexamined, which typically occurs weeks or months prior to surgery.

At the time of surgery, the surgeon may bring a copy (e.g., a printout)of the Alpha Angle measurements (or the Center Edge Angle measurements)to the operating room so that the printout is available as a referenceduring surgery. The surgeon may also have access to these measurementswith a computer located in or near the operating room, which isconnected to the hospital's PACS system (Picture Archiving andCommunication System). Either way, the surgeon can have thepre-operative measurements available as a reference during surgery.

However, while the surgeon is debriding bone on the cam (or pincer), thesurgeon cannot get an updated measurement of the Alpha Angle (or theCenter Edge Angle) to determine if more bone needs to be removed. Inorder to achieve this, the patient would have to be moved out of theoperating room to the imaging room, the necessary image(s) obtained, themeasurements (Alpha Angle or Center Edge Angle) calculated, and then thepatient moved back to the operating room. The time necessary to do this,while requiring the operating room staff to wait, in addition to theinability to maintain sterility of the patient's surgical site, makethis an impractical solution. As a result, the surgeon lacks the abilityto measure the Alpha Angle (and/or the Center Edge Angle) duringsurgery. Therefore, the surgeon cannot make these anatomicalmeasurements while bone is being removed to assess if sufficient bonehas been removed or if additional bone removal is required. The surgeryis completed without updated anatomical measurements to confirm that thecam (and/or pincer) pathologies have been adequately treated.

Accordingly, another object of the present invention is to provide thesurgeon with a novel method and apparatus to take images at multipletime points during a surgery, measure the anatomy using the images, andthen continue the surgery, all without disrupting the surgicalprocedure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises a novel method and apparatus fortreating a joint.

In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a novel methodand apparatus for guiding the surgeon during an arthroscopic debridementprocedure to treat cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. In onepreferred form of the invention, there is provided a novel computervisual guidance system wherein a 2D image obtained from an ordinaryC-arm X-ray device is automatically analyzed and annotated so as toprovide the surgeon with additional information for guiding the surgeonthrough an arthroscopic debridement procedure to treat cam-typefemoroacetabular impingement. In one particularly preferred form of theinvention, the surgeon lines up the C-arm X-ray device with thepatient's hip, captures an X-ray image of the hip (femur andacetabulum), and the computer visual guidance system then automaticallydetects the edges of the femur and acetabulum, and computes and displaysmeasurements of the cam pathology. The computer visual guidance systemmay additionally identify the cam pathology which is to be removed, andthen annotate the C-arm image so as to show the surgeon the bone whichis to be removed.

The surgeon preferably utilizes this tool iteratively during theresection until the cam pathology is completely removed, therebyensuring that the appropriate bone is resected. This iterative approachcan be repeated with the patient's leg in multiple positions so that the2D projection of the cam pathology is visible under a variety offluoroscopic visualizations.

In one form of the invention, automatic Alpha Angle measurement isperformed and an Alpha Angle diagram is displayed. The advantage ofutilizing the Alpha Angle measurement is that it is already commonlyused to diagnose patients with cam-type impingement. However, AlphaAngle measurements have practical limitations. The Alpha Angle describeswhere the femoral head stops being round, but it does not define how fara resection should go around the head (e.g., further medial or lateralor posterior), nor does it define how far distally down the neck thatresection should be smoothed and extended.

Further embodiments of the invention address these limitations. First, asecond line is drawn for the Alpha Angle, with the second linedesignating the target Alpha Angle (in addition to thecurrently-measured Alpha Angle). The area outside the femoral headcircle and between the currently-measured Alpha Angle line and thetarget Alpha Angle line describes the initial cam pathology which is tobe removed, which is roughly triangular. Furthermore, a smoothtransition is preferably provided between the bone resection and theremaining bone. This process is then preferably repeated by eitherre-positioning the patient's leg or moving the C-arm so as to obtainadditional projections. It will be appreciated that obtaining aplurality of projections allows the surgeon to approximate the total 3Dresection.

In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided anovel method and apparatus for guiding the surgeon during anarthroscopic debridement procedure to treat pincer-type femoroacetabularimpingement. In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided anovel computer visual guidance system wherein a 2D image obtained froman ordinary C-arm X-ray device is analyzed and annotated so as toprovide the surgeon with additional information for guiding the surgeonthrough an arthroscopic debridement procedure to treat pincer-typefemoroacetabular impingement. In one particularly preferred form of theinvention, the surgeon lines up the C-arm X-ray device with thepatient's hip, captures an X-ray image of the hip (femur andacetabulum), and then the computer visual guidance system automaticallydetects the edges of the femur and acetabulum, and then computes anddisplays measurements of the pincer pathology. The computer visualguidance system may additionally identify the pincer pathology which isto be removed, and then annotate the C-arm image so as to show thesurgeon the bone which is to be removed.

In one form of the invention, an automatic Center Edge Angle measurementis performed and a Center Edge Angle diagram is displayed. Due to thefact that the Center Edge Angle requires proper vertical orientation ofthe pelvis, additional anatomy must be present in the X-ray image. Thesystem can either utilize the contralateral femoral head to establishthe horizontal plane for the Center Edge Angle measurement, or thesystem can use the pubic synthesis to establish the vertical plane forthe Center Edge Angle measurement (however, this latter approach istypically less preferred since it is generally less accurate).

Similar to the Alpha Angle measurement, a simple measurement of theCenter Edge Angle has its limitations. More particularly, a simplemeasurement of the Center Edge Angle does not define how far a resectionshould go, nor does it describe how the resection should be smoothed andextended. Therefore, in further embodiments of the invention, a targetline and resection smoothing may be provided. Furthermore, an iterativeapproach to both resection and orientation are desirable to ensure aprecise resection.

It should be appreciated that annotating X-ray images is not, in itself,novel. Alpha Angle, Center Edge Angle and other resection measurementsand annotations are routinely conducted pre-operatively. However, thesemeasurements and annotations are done manually by the surgeon or by theradiologist. And, significantly, these resection measurements andannotations are done pre-operatively—once a surgeon has scrubbed intosurgery and the patient is under anesthesia, time is limited and thesurgeon is busy manipulating the arthroscope and the resectioninstruments. Prior to the present invention, surgeons were not able totake resection measurements and have annotations on the X-ray images inreal time during surgery. The computer visual guidance system of thepresent invention makes assisted surgery quick, accurate and hands-free.

In one form of the invention, there is provided a computer visualguidance system for guiding a surgeon through an arthroscopicdebridement of a bony pathology, wherein the computer visual guidancesystem is configured to:

(i) receive a 2D image of the bony pathology from a source;

(ii) automatically analyze the 2D image so as to determine at least onemeasurement with respect to the bony pathology;

(iii) automatically annotate the 2D image with at least one annotationrelating to the at least one measurement determined with respect to thebony pathology so as to create an annotated 2D image; and

(iv) display the annotated 2D image to the surgeon so as to guide thesurgeon through the arthroscopic debridement of the bony pathology.

In another form of the invention, there is provided a method for guidinga surgeon through an arthroscopic debridement of a bony pathology,wherein the method comprises:

providing a computer visual guidance system, wherein the computer visualguidance system is configured to:

-   -   (i) receive a 2D image of the bony pathology from a source;    -   (ii) automatically analyze the 2D image so as to determine at        least one measurement with respect to the bony pathology;    -   (iii) automatically annotate the 2D image with at least one        annotation relating to the at least one measurement determined        with respect to the bony pathology so as to create an annotated        2D image; and    -   (iv) display the annotated 2D image to the surgeon so as to        guide the surgeon through the arthroscopic debridement of the        bony pathology;

providing a 2D image of the bony pathology to the computer visualguidance system; and

displaying the annotated 2D image to the surgeon.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects and features of the present invention will bemore fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detaileddescription of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is tobe considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein likenumbers refer to like parts, and further wherein:

FIGS. 1A-1D are schematic views showing various aspects of hip motion;

FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing bone structures in the region of thehip joint;

FIG. 3 is a schematic anterior view of the femur;

FIG. 4 is a schematic posterior view of the top end of the femur;

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the pelvis;

FIGS. 6-12 are schematic views showing bone and soft tissue structuresin the region of the hip joint;

FIG. 13 is a schematic view showing cam-type femoroacetabularimpingement (i.e., cam-type FAI);

FIG. 14 is a schematic view showing pincer-type femoroacetabularimpingement (i.e., pincer-type FAI);

FIG. 15 is a schematic view showing a labral tear;

FIG. 16 is a schematic view showing an Alpha Angle determination on thehip of a patient;

FIG. 17 is a schematic view showing a Center Edge Angle determination onthe hip of a patient;

FIG. 18 is a schematic view showing the head and neck of a femur and acam-type femoroacetabular impingement site;

FIG. 19 is a schematic view showing a surgical suite incorporating thepresent invention;

FIG. 20 is a flowchart which shows one preferred implementation of thepresent invention;

FIG. 21 is a schematic view showing a typical image acquired by a C-armX-ray device;

FIG. 22 is a schematic view showing a typical image acquired from amedical center's PACS servers;

FIG. 23 is a schematic view showing how an X-ray image can be de-warped;

FIG. 24 is a schematic view showing one way for calibrating pixel size;

FIGS. 25 and 26 are schematic views showing another way for calibratingpixel size;

FIG. 27 is a schematic view showing still another way for calibratingpixel size;

FIG. 28 is a schematic view showing how a surgeon can provide “hints” tothe system using touchscreen tablet 130;

FIG. 29 is a schematic view showing one way of determining whether theX-ray image is of the left hip or the right hip;

FIG. 30 is a schematic view showing how the surgeon-supplied “hints” maybe used to determine whether the X-ray image is of the left hip or theright hip;

FIG. 31 is a schematic view showing one way for providing a clue ofwhere to start the analysis of the anatomy;

FIG. 32 is a schematic view showing one way for determining the searcharea;

FIG. 33 is a schematic view showing edge detection;

FIG. 33A is a schematic view showing estimation of the femoral head;

FIG. 34 is a schematic view showing another way for finding the femoralhead;

FIG. 35 is a schematic view showing one way for finding where thefemoral neck stops being round and the cam legion starts;

FIG. 36 is a schematic view showing one way of measuring the Alpha Angleand for drawing extra features on the X-ray image;

FIG. 37 is a schematic view showing the resection curve for treatingcam-type femoroacetabular impingement;

FIG. 38 is a schematic view showing another way of drawing extrafeatures on the X-ray image;

FIG. 39 is a schematic view showing one way of drawing extra features onthe X-ray image;

FIG. 40 is a schematic view showing another way of drawing extrafeatures on the X-ray image;

FIG. 41 is a schematic view showing another way of drawing extrafeatures on the X-ray image;

FIGS. 42-44 is a series of schematic views showing Alpha Anglerecalculations to track progress during the resecting of a campathology;

FIGS. 45-47 is a series of schematic views showing Alpha Anglerecalculations to track progress during the resecting of a campathology;

FIG. 48 is a schematic view showing pincer-type femoroacetabularimpingement; and

FIG. 49 is a schematic view showing a Center Edge Angle calculation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention comprises a novel method and apparatus fortreating a joint.

In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a novel methodand apparatus for guiding the surgeon during an arthroscopic debridementprocedure to treat cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a novelmethod and apparatus for guiding the surgeon during an arthroscopicdebridement procedure to treat pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Method and Apparatus for the Treatment of Cam-Type FemoroacetabularImpingement in a Hip Joint

FIG. 18 is a schematic view of a femur 60 comprising the femoral head 10and the femoral neck 20, and illustrates the cam-type femoroacetabularimpingement site 30 which needs to be debrided in order to treat thecam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

The present invention comprises the provision and use of a novelcomputer visual guidance system which analyzes an X-ray image (e.g., anintra-operative C-arm X-ray image) to automatically measure features ofthe hip, such as the cam pathology (e.g., by using an “Alpha Angle”calculation, see below), and then annotates the X-ray image for use bythe surgeon in treating the cam pathology. The purpose of this inventionis to guide the surgeon to an optimal resection of the pathology whichis causing the impingement. As noted above, arthroscopic resections arecurrently “eye-balled” and the surgeon has no objective way to definecompletion of the boney resection. This leads to over-resection and,most commonly, under-resection of the cam—which is the leading cause ofrevision hip arthroscopy. Furthermore, surgeons currently have noability to measure Alpha Angle during surgery, so there is no means todetermine if sufficient bone has been removed. The present inventionaddresses this problem by providing means which automatically analyze anX-ray image with respect to a cam pathology and then automaticallyannotate the X-ray image with guidance features which can be used by thesurgeon in treating the cam pathology.

More particularly, the present invention comprises a series of stepswhich start with an X-ray image and yields a measurement of a feature ofthe hip (e.g., the Alpha Angle) and an annotation which is correctlydisplayed on that X-ray image for the surgeon to be able to assess thepathology and progress towards proper resection.

FIG. 19 shows a surgical suite incorporating the present invention. Moreparticularly, in a typical arthroscopic surgical suite, the surgeon usesan arthroscope 105 and a monitor 110 to directly view an internalsurgical site. In addition, the surgeon also uses a C-arm X-ray machine115 and a fluoroscopic monitor 120 to image the internal surgical site.In accordance with the present invention, there is also provided a novelcomputer visual guidance system 125 which automatically analyzes anX-ray image obtained from C-arm X-ray machine 115 with respect toselected features of the hip associated with a cam pathology and thenautomatically annotates the X-ray image displayed on computer visualguidance system 125 with guidance features for use by the surgeon intreating the cam pathology. In one preferred form of the invention,computer visual guidance system 125 comprises a general purpose computerhaving input and output means and which is appropriately programmed soas to provide the functionality disclosed herein. In one preferred formof the invention, computer visual guidance system 125 comprises a tabletdevice with an integrated computer processor and user input/outputfunctionality, e.g., a touchscreen. In this form of the invention, thecomputer visual guidance system 125 may be located in the sterile field,for example, the computer visual guidance system 125 may comprise atouchscreen tablet mounted to the surgical table or to a boom-typetablet support. The computer visual guidance system 125 may be coveredby a sterile drape to maintain the surgeon's sterility as he or sheoperates the touchscreen tablet. Alternatively, computer visual guidancesystem 125 may comprise other general purpose computers with appropriateprogramming and input/output functionality, e.g., a desktop or laptopcomputer with a keyboard, mouse, touchscreen display, heads-up display,voice activation feature, pupil reading device, etc.

In one preferred form of the invention, the invention comprises thesteps discussed below and shown in flowchart form in FIG. 20.

Step 1: Obtain the X-ray Image

In the preferred form of the invention, the first step is to obtain theX-ray image. There are multiple ways to effect this.

1A. Directly from a C-Arm X-ray Machine

In one form of the invention, the X-ray image is obtained directly froma C-arm X-ray device, e.g., C-arm X-ray machine 115 (FIG. 19). This maybe done by wire or wireless connection between C-arm X-ray machine 115and computer visual guidance system 125.

These images from the C-arm X-ray device are typically circular with ablack background. Bones are dark, soft tissue is lighter, no X-rayabsorption is white. See FIG. 21.

Since the computer visual guidance system 125 (FIG. 19) is separate fromthe C-arm X-ray device, it is necessary to detect when a new image hasbeen taken by the C-arm X-ray device. This may be done by connecting thecomputer visual guidance system 125 directly to the video output of theC-arm X-ray device, and using the method described in International(PCT) Patent Application Publication No. WO 2012/149664A1 (whichcorresponds to International (PCT) Patent Application No.PCT/EP2011/057105) to detect when a new image is taken. In essence, thismethod looks at image blocks to see if there is a significant changebetween one image block and the previous image block. If there is alarge change between image blocks, then an image is captured and thiscaptured image is the image used in the method of the present invention.

Alternatively, other approaches well known in the art of X-ray imagingmay be used to detect when a new image is taken.

The X-ray image may also be transmitted from C-arm X-ray machine 115 tocomputer visual guidance system 125 over a local area network. In thisform of the invention, C-arm X-ray machine 115 communicates with thelocal area network with, for example, a wireless or wired connection. Inthis form of the invention, computer visual guidance system 125 receivesthe X-ray image from the local area network. Depending on the networkspeed, this can occur substantially instantaneously.

1B. Previous Image from Surgery

A surgeon may also want to use an image taken earlier in the surgicalprocedure. In this scenario, a previous image can be retrieved from, forexample, the C-arm X-ray machine 115 and imported into computer visualguidance system 125. A previous image may, alternatively, be retrievedfrom the computer visual guidance system 125 and used for furtheranalysis.

1C. Previous Image Taken Prior to Surgery

A surgeon may also want to use an image taken during pre-operativediagnostic X-rays, etc. In this form of the invention, computer visualguidance system 125 communicates with the hospital's PACS servers, andan image taken previously is downloaded and the image used in the methodof the present invention. Where a pre-operative image is used, thepre-operative image is typically rectangular with no black background.The pre-op images are inverted relative to the C-arm images. Bones arelight, soft tissue is darker, no X-ray absorption is black. A pre-opimage needs to be inverted for analysis (i.e., so as to be similar to aC-arm image) and then inverted back after analysis for viewing. See FIG.22.

It should be appreciated that other pre-operative image configurationsmay also be used—what is important is that both pre-operative andintra-operative images can be utilized with computer visual guidancesystem 125. It should also be appreciated that a pre-operative image maybe provided to computer visual guidance system 125 by other means, e.g.,a USB drive or other static drive or portable storage device, etc.

Step 2: Display

After the X-ray image is acquired, it is displayed to the surgeon oncomputer visual guidance system 125 and/or monitor 110. See FIGS. 21 and22. The advantage of displaying the X-ray image to the surgeon prior tomaking measurements from that X-ray image is that the surgeon can viewthe acquired image and determine if it is an appropriate image toanalyze and, if not, take another X-ray image without losing valuableoperating room (OR) time while waiting for computer visual guidancesystem 125 to process the image.

Step 3: De-warp the Image

In one preferred form of the invention, the next step is to de-warp theintra-operative X-ray image.

More particularly, images from some C-arm X-ray machines 115 are oftendistorted (“warped”) such that every object in the image may not bescaled identically. This is due to the fact that the X-ray beam is notperfectly linear. Typically, objects closer to the X-ray source of theC-arm X-ray device appear larger (and comprise more pixels).Correspondingly, other objects of the same size located further awayfrom the X-ray source of the C-arm X-ray device will appear smaller (andcomprise less pixels). To make precise measurements, this warping needsto be removed. For example, the Stryker “Fluoro Disc” product providesthis de-warping function by projecting a predetermined pattern onto theintra-operative X-ray image. See FIG. 23.

It should be appreciated that this de-warping step is optional, however,it makes calibration and any subsequent measurements more accurate(e.g., see Step 16 below), and is generally desirable since it makes theAlpha Angle measurement more accurate by correcting for image distortionvia the de-warping process. Some newer C-arm X-ray devices (e.g., thosewith a flat panel detector) may automatically provide de-warped imagesand therefore may not require this de-warping step.

Step 4: Calibrate the Pixel Size

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to calibratethe pixel size. It should be appreciated that this pixel calibrationstep is optional, however, it is required for the measurement functionin Step 16, and is generally desirable since it makes measurements offeatures shown on an X-ray image more accurate. Some newer C-arm X-raydevices (e.g., those with a flat panel detector with integrated DICOM)may provide calibrated pixel sizes and therefore may not require thispixel calibration step.

More particularly, in order to accurately measure distances in theimage, pixels must first be calibrated (i.e., so that a pixel in a givenimage is correlated to a real-world dimension). It is also helpful toknow the pixel size when trying to limit the diameters of the femoralhead that are being analyzed (see Step 11A below).

It is important to note that de-warping the image (as described above inStep 3) will improve the accuracy of pixel calibration.

There are multiple ways to calibrate pixel size. Some preferredapproaches will now be discussed.

4A. External Calibration Marker

A first way to calibrate pixel size is to put a radio-opaque marker onthe skin of the patient that is visible in the X-ray image. Thisradio-opaque marker can be large and placed a few centimeters distalfrom the greater trochanter. The radio-opaque marker has an adhesive onits rear side to stick to the patient's skin. The radio-opaque marker ispreferably disposable. In one preferred form of the invention, themarker is flat, circular and simple to identify with computer vision.Since the marker is of known size (mm), and the number of pixels can becounted on the X-ray (px), it is a simple matter to calculate mm/px(i.e., to calculate the pixel size). Note that, in practice, it is bestto treat the circle as an ellipse, since the radio-opaque marker doesnot always lie flat on the patient—therefore, one can use the major axisof the ellipse for calibration. Note also that this approach forcalibrating pixel size is the furthest “out of plane” (i.e., out of theplane of the object of interest, since the marker is on the surface ofthe skin and the object of interest is at an internal site), so itlikely has calibration error without de-warping the image. See FIG. 24,which shows a radio-opaque marker 130 visible in the X-ray image.

4B. Internal Calibration Marker

Instead of using an external calibration marker, pixel calibration canbe effected by placing a calibration marker of known size into the jointspace and, more preferably, directly on the bone. The calibration markeris radio-opaque and thus will be visible on X-ray. It is preferablyhighly radio-opaque, for example constructed of solid metal, and thuswill have high contrast with the anatomy. This would make the “plane” ofthe pixel calibration more accurate, i.e., the calibration marker willlie closer to the plane of the object of interest. This calibrationmarker can be re-usable and sterilized by almost any method due to itssimplicity. See FIGS. 25 and 26, which show a radio-opaque calibrationmarker 135 at the distal end of an instrument 140.

4C. Using The Burr/Scope in the X-ray Image

One downside of using a dedicated calibration marker is that it adds anadditional instrument to the procedure, and can disrupt the naturalworkflow of the medical procedure. If, instead, surgical instruments ofknown size that are already present in the image (e.g., the burr andscope) can be used, this disruption can be avoided. These surgicalinstruments (e.g., burr and scope) are much more complex shapes,however, and tend to be more difficult to identify with computer vision.Fortunately, 3D computer models of these surgical instruments aregenerally available, so these 3D models can be matched up to the 2DX-ray images from the C-arm X-ray machine 115 to first identify thesurgical instruments, and then their known dimensions can be used forpixel calibration. Alternatively, some surgical instruments includeencoded information that identifies the surgical instrument; by way ofexample but not limitation, this information can be encoded into thesurgical instrument by way of an EPROM carried by the surgicalinstrument. This identifying information can include the make and modelnumber of the surgical instrument, or may include physical dimensions.This information can be passed to computer visual guidance system 125 sothat a known dimension of the surgical instrument can be used for pixelcalibration. If the information is in the form of a make and modelnumber, then computer visual guidance system 125 may comprise a table ofdimensions associated with that particular surgical instrument. See FIG.27, which shows a burr 145 and a scope 150.

4D. Using a Pre-Operative Image

The pixel size in the image may also be calibrated based onpre-operative images that have a known scale, such as MRI or CT images.More particularly, if the pre-operative image has a known scale, then anobject appearing in both the pre-operative image and intra-operativeimage can be compared to determine pixel calibration. For example, theradius of the femoral head can be measured. The femoral head radius canbe determined from the X-ray image in number of pixels and, using theknown femoral head radius measured pre-operatively, the pixel sizerelative to real-world distance can be computed. However, if thepre-operative and intra-operative images are not taken in the sameplane, a small error may be present due to imperfect femoral headsymmetry. Creating 2D images from a 3D computer model increases theability to match the images well and minimize error.

In one preferred form of the invention, the pixel size in the X-rayimage obtained from C-arm X-ray machine 115 is calibrated by (i) firstobtaining a measurement of the radius of the femoral head from apre-operative image, and then (ii) correlating the pixel count of theradius of the femoral head with the previously-obtained measurement ofthe radius of the femoral head in order to calibrate the pixel size inthe X-ray image obtained from C-arm X-ray machine 115. In this form ofthe invention, the measurement from the pre-operative image can bemanually input into computer visual guidance system 125 by the operator(for example, the surgeon). In another embodiment, computer visualguidance system 125 can read the measurement from a file that itaccesses. For example, the femoral head size could be meta dataassociated with a pdf file that computer visual guidance system 125accesses. In this embodiment, the pdf file can be a pre-operative plangenerated from a pre-operative 3D image (e.g., a CT scan).

In order to calibrate pixel size by this method, the sequence of stepsmust be changed. This Step 4D would come after the femoral head has beenfound using computer vision, e.g., after Step 11 below.

Step 5: Provide Hints

The next step is to provide “hints” to the system. These “hints”generally serve to speed up the analysis, however, they can also be usedfor other purposes, e.g., to help identify whether the X-ray image is ofthe left hip or the right hip, or to help in computing the resectioncurve (see below), etc.

In one preferred form of the invention, and looking now at FIG. 28, thesurgeon preferably provides two hints to the system: a femoral head hint155 and a femoral neck hint 160. This is preferably done by displayingthe X-ray image obtained by C-arm X-ray machine 115 onto an outputscreen of computer visual guidance system 125 (e.g., the touchscreen ofa tablet comprising computer visual guidance system 125), and thenprompting the surgeon to (i) touch the center of the femoral head so asto provide a femoral head hint 155, and (ii) prompting the surgeon totouch the mid-line of the femoral neck so as to provide a femoral neckhint 160.

Note that once the surgeon provides the femoral head hint 155 and thefemoral neck hint 160 to the system, these hints may be automaticallyincorporated into subsequent images obtained by C-arm X-ray machine 115.More particularly, in this form of the invention, a new X-ray image iscompared to a previous image containing the femoral head hint 155 andthe femoral neck hint 160. If the new image is sufficiently similar tothe previous image, then the femoral head hint 155 and the femoral neckhint 160 from the previous image are used for the new image. This willsave valuable OR time and be convenient for the surgeon in that thesurgeon will not have to provide new hints to computer visual guidancesystem 125 for each new image acquired.

Step 6: Determine Whether the X-ray Image is of the Left Hip or theRight Hip

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to determinewhether the X-ray image is of the left or the right hip.

More particularly, knowing whether a left hip or right hip is beingimaged enables computer visual guidance system 125 to more efficientlyanalyze the X-ray image; for example, to search for the femoral neck,computer visual guidance system 125 only need look on the right side ofthe femoral head for a left hip or on the left side of the femoral headfor a right hip.

There are multiple ways to determine whether the X-ray image is of theleft or the right hip. In any method, it is assumed that the X-ray imageis provided to the visual guidance system in the correct manner, and hasnot been flipped (e.g., reversed), and is generally oriented with thetop of the image being in the superior (i.e., cephalad) direction of thepatient.

6A. Patient Data

Prior to surgery, patient data entry may include identification of theleft hip or the right hip. Computer visual guidance system 125 cansubsequently read this data. For example, a patient data file mayinclude the hip type, and computer visual guidance system 125 obtainsthis information by accessing the patient data file. Alternatively, theleft or the right hip can be ascertained by pre-operative software froma 3D image (e.g., CT, MRI) or 2D image (e.g., X-ray) and subsequentlyread by computer visual guidance system 125

6B. Light/Dark Side

X-ray technicians will usually rotate the C-arm image so that “up” onthe image correlates to “superior” on the anatomy—if one assumes thatthis is true, then one can just look at the left and right sides of thebeam cone to see which is darker on average. If the left side of theX-ray image is darker, then the image is of the left hip. If the leftside of the X-ray image is lighter, then the image is of the right hip.This is because bone tissue absorbs X-rays and appears darker on theimage. Air or soft tissue attenuates less X-rays, so they appear muchlighter on the image. See FIG. 29, where the left side 165 of the X-rayimage is darker and the right side 170 of the X-ray image is lighter.

The Light/Dark Side method is not useful if the C-arm image is notrotated so that “up” on the image correlates to “superior” on theanatomy.

6C: Using the Surgeon-Supplied Hints

In one preferred form of the invention, femoral head hint 155 andfemoral neck hint 160 are used to determine whether the X-ray image isof the left hip or the right hip. More particularly, and looking now atFIG. 30, the horizontal distance 175 from femoral head hint 155 andfemoral neck hint 160 is determined. If femoral head hint 155 is to theleft of femoral neck hint 160, the X-ray image is of the left hip, iffemoral head hint 155 is to the right of femoral neck hint 160, theX-ray image is of the right hip.

6D: Instrument Position

In another form of the invention, if an instrument is in the X-rayimage, computer visual guidance system 125 can use the location andorientation of the instrument to determine if the hip being imaged is aleft hip or a right hip. Typically, instruments are introduced on thelateral side of the femoral head, with a trajectory from lateral tomedial. Given this fact, computer visual guidance system 125 can firstlocate an instrument in the X-ray image, then identify the location andorientation of the instrument within the X-ray image so as to determineif the hip being imaged is a left hip or a right hip.

Step 7: Provide Clues for where to Create the Search Area for FemoralHead

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to providecomputer visual guidance system 125 with clues for where to start itsanalysis of the anatomy. This is desirable because processing will runfaster if the analysis starts with an intelligent “guess” of the anatomyto center on.

There are multiple ways to provide clues for where to start.

7A. Center of Search Area

In one approach, it is possible to simply use femoral head hint 155 (atthe center of the femoral head) as the place to start the analysis.

7B. Tips of Instruments

Another way to intelligently guess where to start the analysis is to usethe tips of the medical instruments present in the surgical field. Evenif one does not know what the medical instruments are, they typicallyhave an elongated shape and a Hough transform can be used to look forparallel lines (which indicate the profiles of the elongated medicalinstruments). The center of the femoral head will typically be somewherenear the tips of the medical instruments, at least within one diameterof the largest possible femoral head, and usually in front of themedical instruments. If two medical instruments are present in the X-rayimage (there typically will be), then the estimate of where to start theanalysis becomes more accurate, since one can limit the region ofinterest to the intersection of the parallel lines of the medicalinstruments (i.e., the side profiles of the medical instruments). SeeFIG. 31, where the tips of burr 145 and scope 150 are used to provide aclue as to where to start the analysis of the anatomy.

Step 8: Determine the Search Area for Femoral Head

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to determinethe search area. This is desirable because the more pixels that computervisual guidance system 125 has to look at, the longer the search time.So anything that can reduce the search area will speed up processingtime.

There are multiple ways to determine the search area. In one preferredform of the invention, the image area outside the beam cone iseliminated. Most C-arms provide a circular image on a black background.This is because the beam of X-rays is arranged in a cone, and isreceived by a circular image intensifier. It is not necessary to searchthe black areas of the X-ray image. In fact, it can be assumed that thefemoral head will be mostly, if not entirely, inside the beam cone ofthe X-ray image. It is possible, therefore, to narrow the search for thefemoral head to those structures that have a center point well insidethe beam cone. A search area is defined around the clue from Step 7. SeeFIG. 32, where a search area 180 is shown defined around the clue fromStep 7.

Step 9: Conduct Edge Detection

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to conduct edgedetection of the relevant anatomy to determine the edges of the femoralhead. There are multiple ways to carry this out including industrystandard methods such as canny edge detection. See FIG. 33, which showsedge detection for the femoral head.

Step 10: Find/Remove Instrument Edges

After edge detection has been effected, it is desirable to find andremove the edges of any instruments that are in the search area, sincethe presence of instrument edges in the image can complicate subsequentprocessing steps (e.g., finding the femoral head, finding the femoralneck, etc.). Finding and removing instrument edges may be effected inways well known in the art of image processing.

Step 11: Find the Femoral Head

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to find thefemoral head. There are multiple ways to find the femoral head.

11A. Hough Transform

The simplest method to find the femoral head is to use a Houghtransform, looking for circles. These circles are limited in the rangeof the smallest and largest possible femoral heads. The Hough transformproduces a list of possible answers and the best possible answer isselected. This method works well in high quality images, although it canfail in low quality images. See FIG. 33A, which shows circle 5encircling the femoral head.

11B. Ray Tracing

One problem with the aforementioned Hough transform approach is that itis looking for circles that perfectly overlap with edges in the X-rayimage. In some cases, there is almost no perfect circle in the X-rayimage, especially with poor image quality and a large cam pathology.

Therefore, in another approach, a center point is picked, and thencomputer visual guidance system 125 starts tracing along lines lookingfor edges between the minimum and maximum possible radii (whichcorrelates to the smallest and largest possible femoral head). In thisapproach, computer visual guidance system 125 selects the point that hasthe strongest edge in each ray, and then checks to see if these pointsend up in a circle. Then another point is selected, and the process isrepeated. This is done iteratively until the best point is found, usingprevious points as a guide for where to look next.

This approach can be further improved in the following ways:

-   -   perform a radial blur at each point before running edge        detection—this will obscure hard edges that are not circles;    -   look for strong edges, and check their gradients to see if they        are dark→light (femoral head) or light→dark (acetabulum); and    -   look for partial circles, rather than full circles—the correct        outline of the femoral head will not have an edge where the        femoral neck connects to the femoral head.

11C. Active Shape Modeling (ASM)

In Active Shape Modeling (ASM), computer visual guidance system 125 istrained with hundreds (or thousands) of hip X-ray images, where dozensof specific locations are selected around the profile of the femoralhead. Then computer visual guidance system 125 is presented with a newX-ray image and a “good guess” as to where the femur is in that image.This “good guess” does not have to be highly accurate, it simply needsto be in the right ballpark. Step 7 (provide clues where to start) mustbe completed for this approach to be used. Once computer visual guidancesystem 125 has the image and the “good guess” of where to start, the ASMprocess will overlay a set of points in the shape of a femur and thenwork to reduce the error between the set of points and the strong edgesin the image. See FIG. 34. Once the ASM process is completed by thecomputer visual guidance system, one can just select the specific pointsfrom the femur and calculate a best-fit circle for the femoral head.

Step 12: Find the Femoral Neck and its Mid-line

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to find thefemoral neck and its mid-line. There are multiple ways to find thefemoral neck and its mid-line.

12A. Box Sweep

It is generally easier to find the femoral neck once the femoral headhas been identified. With the Box Sweep method, computer visual guidancesystem 125 sweeps a box around the femoral head (where the box has itsmid-line passing through the center of the femoral head) and looks tosee if the sides of that box line up with the edges of the femoral neck(edge detection is used to identify the edges of the femoral neck). Thisis repeated for boxes of multiple sizes. The box that lines up with thestrongest edges of the femoral neck is chosen. The center of the box isthen used to determine the mid-line of the femoral neck.

12B. Active Shape Modeling (ASM)

This approach works in a manner similar to how ASM is used to find thefemoral head, except that one selects the points on the femoral neck,then determines a mid-line, and then finds the average location of thosepoints to determine the mid-line of the femoral neck.

Step 13: Find where the Femoral Neck Stops Being Round and the CamPathology Starts

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to find wherethe femoral head stops being round and the cam pathology starts.

In one preferred approach, the strongest edges (e.g., as shown at 182 inFIG. 33) of the bone surface are traced (e.g., using the results of edgedetection) until a deviation from the circle around the femoral head isfound. As the region of interest is known, the tracing does not need toinclude the entire femoral head but rather just the region of interest.In one preferred embodiment, the region of interest starts at a locationon the femoral head which is approximately 110 degrees from the femoralneck mid-line in the superior direction (in other words, for a right hipas shown in FIG. 35, between the 9 o'clock position and the 12 noonposition). In identifying a deviation, a threshold level for thedeviation can be used to ignore small deviations which may be a resultof imperfections in edge detection rather than being the actual campathology. In one preferred embodiment, the deviation threshold is asmall percentage of the femoral head diameter, for example, 3-6% of thefemoral head diameter, and more preferably 4% of the femoral headdiameter. In another embodiment, the deviation threshold is a fixedvalue, for example, 0.5-2 mm, and more preferably 1 mm. In thisembodiment, it is preferable to have calibrated the pixels of the image,so that the relative pixel size to the size of the anatomy is known. SeeFIG. 35.

Step 14: Measure the Alpha Angle and Input the Target Alpha Angle

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to measure theAlpha Angle.

As seen in FIG. 36, the Alpha Angle 35 is calculated as the anglebetween these image features:

-   -   the center line 15 of the femoral neck;    -   the center point 185 of the femoral head; and    -   the location of the start of the cam pathology 30 at the femoral        head/neck junction.

In other words, the Alpha Angle is the angle measured between (i) theline 15 originating at the center of the femoral head and extendingalong the center of the femoral neck, and (ii) the line 25 originatingat the center of the femoral head and passing through the location atthe start of the cam pathology.

This Alpha Angle can be annotated onto the X-ray image, as shown in FIG.36, along with circle 5 enscribing the femoral head and line 15 showingthe center of the femoral neck, and this annotated X-ray image can bepresented to the surgeon on computer visual guidance system 125 ormonitor 110.

The surgeon may also find it useful to know the size of the campathology by way of the angle subtended between the Alpha Angle and thetarget Alpha Angle (i.e., the desired Alpha Angle). The target AlphaAngle is established, either with input from the surgeon or anothersource. The computer visual guidance system 125 then displays the targetAlpha Angle (line 190 in FIG. 36). The greater the difference betweenthe current Alpha Angle line 25 and the target Alpha Angle line 190, thelarger the cam pathology and hence more bone removal is required. SeeFIG. 36, where the target Alpha Angle of 42 degrees is presented as line190 on the X-ray image, along with the actual Alpha Angle line 25,circle 5 enscribing the femoral head, and line 15 showing the center ofthe femoral neck.

Step 15: Compute the Resection Curve

Looking now at FIG. 37, the resection curve 195 comprises a firstresection curve 200 adjacent to the femoral head, and a second resectioncurve 205 adjacent to the femoral neck.

First resection curve 200 starts at the Alpha Angle Line 25 and ends atthe target Alpha Angle line 190. Note that first resection curve 200 issimply the continuation of the circle of the femoral head.

Second resection curve 205 starts at the end of first resection curve200 (i.e., at the target Alpha Angle line 190) and extends down theneck.

In the preferred form of the invention, second resection curve 205 iscalculated as follows. First, and looking now at FIG. 38, the startpoint 210 and end point 215 of second resection curve 205 are found. Asseen in FIG. 38, start point 210 is the point at which target AlphaAngle line 190 intersects the femoral head circle. Note that start point210 is also the endpoint of first section curve 200. In one embodiment,end point 215 is found by determining the shortest distance betweenfemoral neck hint 160 and the neck boundary: this shortest line ofintersection defines end point 215. Then a spline 220 is generated,using start point 210, end point 215 and a control point 225 for spline220. Note that spline 220 is second resection curve 205. Control point225 for spline 220 may be generated in a variety of ways. By way ofexample but not limitation, control point 225 may be obtained bystudying a set of “normal” patient anatomies and determining anappropriate control point for a given start point 210 and a givenendpoint 215 in order to provide a spline approximating a normalanatomy. Or control point 225 may be obtained by polling a group ofexperts to determine an appropriate control point for a given startpoint 210 and a given endpoint 215 in order to provide a splineapproximating a normal anatomy. In any case, after start point 210, endpoint 215 and control point 225 have been determined, spline 220 (i.e.,second resection curve 205) is generated and displayed with the X-rayimage.

In essence, second resection curve 205 is concatenated to the end offirst resection curve 200 so as to produce the overall resection curve195.

16. Measure Depth of Resection

If desired, the depth of resection (i.e., the thickness of bone to beremoved) can also be measured and then displayed to the user, using thecalibrations of pixel size previously conducted.

17. Display

In one preferred form of the invention, and still looking now at FIG.38, the following features are presented on the X-ray image:

-   -   circle 5 inscribing the femoral head;    -   centerpoint 185 of the circle inscribing the femoral head;    -   line 15 originating at the center of the femoral head and        extending along the centerline of the femoral neck;    -   Alpha Angle line 25 originating at the center of the femoral        head and passing through the location at the start of the cam        pathology;    -   line 190 showing the target Alpha Angle; and    -   resection curve 195.

If desired, the numeric value of the Alpha Angle can be presented on theX-ray image (see, for example, FIG. 37 where the numeric value of “55”is placed on the X-ray image to show that the Alpha Angle is 50degrees), and the numeric value of the target Alpha Angle can bepresented on the X-ray image (see, for example, FIG. 37 where thenumeric value “42” is placed on the X-ray image to show the target AlphaAngle is 42 degrees).

In the preferred form of the invention, the next step is to draw extrafeatures on the X-ray image.

17A. Ruler

Surgeons may desire to know the size of the cam pathology, so it can beuseful to add a ruler to the image. Pixel calibration is needed for thisfeature, since the ruler needs to identify the “real-world” size of thecam pathology. In one preferred form of the invention, computer visualguidance system 125 is configured to draw the ruler just below the campathology, which will show the surgeon how much bone they have toremove. See FIG. 39.

17B. False Color 2D Cam Pathology

When computer visual guidance system 125 draws the target line for thetarget Alpha Angle, computer visual guidance system 125 can add falsecolor to the triangular region 230 (FIG. 40) denoting the cam pathologywhich is to be removed (i.e., the bone which is located between thestart of the cam and the target Alpha Angle).

In one form of the invention, multiple C-Arm images (e.g., with theC-arm manipulated through a number of planes) can be acquired and thecomputer system can generate the false color 3D cam pathology as aresulting set of false color 2D cam pathology images displayed at thesame time for the surgeon.

By way of example but not limitation, 2D images acquiredintra-operatively by a C-arm X-ray machine 115 can be “merged” with oneanother so as to form a pseudo-3D model of the cam pathology. In thisembodiment, C-arm X-ray machine 115 is oriented in multiple planes suchthat multiple 2D images of the cam pathology are acquired. Computervisual guidance system 125 then merges the acquired 2D images so as toform a partial 3D model of the cam pathology. In one form of thisembodiment, a 2D outline 235 (FIG. 41) of the cam pathology is createdwith the 2D images. Once the images and corresponding outlines of thecam pathology are merged, a 3D representation of the cam pathology canbe generated, for example, by geometric modeling of the outer surface ofthe cam pathology.

18. Adjustments

At this point, the surgeon can adjust the locations of thepreviously-determined femoral head, the previously-determined femoralneck, the previously-determined measured Alpha Angle, thepreviously-determined target Alpha Angle, the previously-determinedresection curve start point, and the previously-determined resectioncurve end point, by simply dragging any of those elements to a desiredlocation using the annotated image displayed by computer visual guidancesystem 125 (e.g., the touchscreen of a tablet device). If the user doesadjust one or more of these locations, computer visual guidance system125 will automatically re-compute the anatomical measurements andresection curve by utilizing the user-specified locations in place ofthe automatically-calculated locations. Subsequent images that areprocessed may or may not take into account the user-specified locationchanges to improve the overall accuracy and robustness of themeasurements and resection curve location. For example, if the userspecifies a larger femoral head radius, the femoral head detectionalgorithm may give preference to a larger detected femoral head. Also,if the user manually adjusts the resection curve end point, subsequentprocessed images may also provide a resection end point that is closerto the user's manual modification, i.e., if the user moves the resectionend point more proximal, then the following images might also place theresection end point more proximal than would be the case by default. Agood method for retaining relative distances between images (with regardto how far proximal or distal relative to the femoral head) would be toretain distances relative to the size of the femoral head. For example,a distance of “1.5 times the femoral head radius” should be a relativelyconstant distance between processed images, regardless of changes inzooming and rotation of the femur (as the femoral head radius isapproximately spherical and should retain a relatively constant radiusregardless of how it is imaged).

The Iterative Nature of Computer Visual Guidance System 125

Significantly, the surgeon can iteratively check the progress of theboney resection by periodically updating the intra-operative X-ray imageand the assessment, by computer visual guidance system 125, of themeasurements associated with the bony pathology. In other words, andlooking now at FIGS. 42-44 and 45-47, as the cam pathology surgeryprogresses, the surgeon periodically updates the intraoperative C-armimage. As this occurs, computer visual guidance system 125 automaticallyre-assesses the cam pathology (i.e., it automatically recalculates theAlpha Angle and the resection curve, etc.), and automatically annotatesthe X-ray image to show how the Alpha Angle changes from the originalAlpha Angle toward the target Alpha Angle. This approach providesiterative guidance to the surgeon, enabling the surgeon to proceed withgreater confidence as the cam pathology is reduced and, ultimately,reduces the possibility of under-resection of the cam pathology whichcould necessitate revision hip arthroscopy.

Note that the additional X-ray images acquired for this iterativeprocess of repeatedly assessing the cam pathology as the surgeryprogresses may be done with the patient's leg and the C-arm X-raymachine remaining in the same position so as to provide updatedassessments of the boney resection with the same X-ray projection; orthe patient's leg may be re-positioned, and/or the C-arm X-ray machinemoved, between X-ray images so as to provide updated assessments of theboney resection with differing X-ray projections.

Additional Feature: Provide Workflow Assistance

It can be important to document the cam pathology, both before and afterremoval. Computer visual guidance system 125 can be configured toprovide step-by-step guidance to the surgeon to make sure thatdocumenting images are captured at the appropriate points along theprocedure, preferably along with automatic measurements.

Additional Feature: Provide Confirmation and Manual Correction

It is expected that computer visual guidance system 125 will never be100% accurate or that the surgeon may make different choices for theirpatient based on experience and their understanding of the patient'scondition. Since images end up being part of a medical record, computervisual guidance system 125 is configured to require manual confirmationfrom the surgeon before saving an image to the medical record. Theseinteractions may be done in the sterile field through a variety of inputdevices including but not limited to:

-   -   wireless mouse (sterile draped)    -   wireless accelerometer with buttons (sterile draped)    -   remote control (sterile draped)    -   tablet (sterile draped)    -   camera buttons.

Method and Apparatus for the Treatment of Pincer-Type FemoroacetabularImpingement in a Hip Joint

FIG. 48 is a schematic view of an acetabulum 240 comprising anacetabular cup 245 for receiving femoral head 10 of femur 60, andillustrates a pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement site 50 whichneeds to be debrided in order to treat the pincer-type femoroacetabularimpingement.

The present invention comprises the provision and use of a novelcomputer visual guidance system which analyzes an X-ray image (e.g., anintra-operative C-arm X-ray image) to automatically measure features ofthe hip, such as the pincer pathology (e.g., by using a “Center EdgeAngle” calculation, see below), and then annotates the X-ray image foruse by the surgeon in treating the pincer pathology. The purpose of thisinvention is to guide the surgeon to an optimal resection of the pincerpathology which is causing the impingement. As noted above, arthroscopicresections are currently “eye-balled” and the surgeon has no objectiveway to define completion of the boney resection. This leads toover-resection and, most commonly, under-resection of the pincerpathology—which is a significant cause of revision hip arthroscopy. Thepresent invention addresses this problem by providing means whichautomatically analyze an X-ray image with respect to a pincer pathologyand then automatically annotates the X-ray image with guidance featureswhich can be used by the surgeon in treating the pincer pathology.

More particularly, the present invention comprises a series of stepswhich start with an X-ray image and yields measurement of a feature ofthe hip (e.g., the Center Edge Angle) and an annotation correctly shownonto that X-ray image for the surgeon to be able to assess the pathologyand progress towards proper resection.

In one preferred form of the invention, the invention utilizes theaforementioned methodology for treating a cam pathology, except that itis modified for treating a pincer pathology. More particularly, Steps11-14 in the cam pathology procedure (FIG. 20) are replaced by thefollowing Steps 11-14 for the pincer pathology treatment.

Step 11: Find the Transverse Pelvic Axis

Looking now at FIG. 49, the transverse pelvic axis 250 is located usingstandard image processing techniques, e.g., by drawing a line betweenthe inferior apexes 255 of the ischium bones (or, alternatively, bydrawing a line between the center of both femoral heads).

Step 12: Find the Perpendicular to the Transverse Pelvic Axis whichExtends Through the Center of the Femoral Head

Still looking now at FIG. 49, the perpendicular 260 to the transversepelvic axis 250 which extends through the center of the femoral head islocated using standard image processing techniques, e.g., by extending aline from the center of the femoral head which is 90 degrees from thetransverse pelvic axis.

Step 13: Find the Line which Extends from the Lateral Acetabular Edge tothe Center of the Femoral Head

Still looking now at FIG. 49, the lateral acetabular edge line 265 whichextends from the lateral edge 270 of the acetabular rim to the center185 of the femoral head is located using standard image processingtechniques, e.g., in an AP (Anterior-Posterior) view, by creating a linewhich passes from the lateral sourcil (the most supereolateral aspect ofthe sclerotic weight-bearing zone of the acetabulum) to the center ofthe femoral head.

Step 14: Measure the Center Edge Angle

Still looking now at FIG. 49, the Center Edge Angle 55 (i.e., the anglebetween the perpendicular 260 and the lateral acetabular edge line 265)is calculated, e.g., by measuring the angle formed between the portionof the perpendicular 260 on the superior side of the femoral head andthe lateral acetabular edge line 265.

The Center Edge Angle of a “normal” person is typically between about 25and about 35 degrees (i.e., the target Center Edge Angle is normallyapproximately 25 degrees to approximately 35 degrees).

Both the actual Center Edge Angle and the target Center Edge Angle canbe automatically computed by computer visual guidance system 125 from anX-ray image and these features automatically annotated on the X-rayimage for display to the surgeon. Furthermore, the difference betweenthe actual Center Edge Angle and the target Center Edge Angle (i.e., theresection section) can be automatically identified by computer visualguidance system 125 and automatically annotated on the X-ray image fordisplay to the surgeon.

Additional Concepts

Connectivity between the computer visual guidance system and the hipdistraction equipment can provide medical personnel with usefulinformation before, during and after a surgical procedure. For instance,the computer visual guidance system can be used to guide the medicalpersonnel through the proper set-up of the distraction equipment,including assembly of the distraction equipment, attachment of thedistraction equipment to the surgical bed, placement of other equipmentin the surgical suite, proper patient positioning and attachment to thedistraction equipment, information on use of the distraction equipmentduring the procedure, cleaning information, storage information anddisassembly instructions. This information may be presented as astep-based system with prompts, or as a menu-driven system, or as aquestion-driven system, that provides users with only the requestedinformation. The information may be presented as text, images (includingvideo) and/or animation (including video), as appropriate, to convey theneeded information.

The computer visual guidance system may be used in conjunction withsensors. By way of example but not limitation, if sensors are placed onthe distraction equipment, the computer visual guidance system canutilize information about the distraction equipment and provide feedbackto medical personnel. For instance, a set of sensors in the distractionequipment can detect the position of the distraction equipment in space.Information about the position of the heel or foot of the patient wouldbe particularly useful as it is typically the attachment point for thepatient to the distraction equipment. Additional information about theposition of the patient's hip could be provided manually or throughcoordination with the C-arm X-ray device. Knowing this information wouldthen provide information about the relative position of the patient'sleg, and specifically their hip (e.g., whether it is in flexion,extension, abduction, adduction, internal or external rotation). Sensorscan also be used to detect when traction is applied, either by measuringthe position of the heel relative to the hip, or by a measurement offorce. Alternatively, image analysis can be done to determine if theacetabulum and femoral head are dislocated allowing the deduction ofwhether traction is applied. This could provide medical personnel withfeedback on the amount of tension applied to the patient, its directionof force (vector), and duration of the application of traction.

Inasmuch as information about the position of the patient and thedistraction equipment is available, it can also be used to help guidemedical personnel during the procedure. For instance, while resecting acam pathology on the femur, it is often important to move the patient'sleg in order to fully visualize the pathology. With the ability to sensethe position of the distraction equipment and therefore the patient'sleg and hip position, the computer visual guidance system can promptmedical personnel on how to position the patient for optimal resection.Furthermore, the positioning of the hip and leg during this part of theprocedure can be driven by pre-operative planning software that has beencreated to analyze and plan the resection. This pre-operative softwaremay generate a series of images showing patient hip positions so thatthe surgeon and operative team can fully visualize the pathology, inparticular the cam pathology. These views can be delivered to thecomputer visual guidance system and used to position the patient duringthe surgery to ensure visualization and review of the resection plan.

Use of the Novel Computer Visual Guidance System for Applications OtherThan Alpha Angle Calculations and/or Center Edge Angle Calculations

It should be appreciated that the novel computer visual guidance systemof the present invention may be used for applications other than thespecific Alpha Angle measurements and/or Center Edge Angle measurementsdiscussed herein as related to the treatment of the hip joint.

By way of example but not limitation, the novel computer visual guidancesystem of the present invention may be used to measure other parametersin order to guide debridement of the femur and/or acetabulum duringtreatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

By way of further example but not limitation, the novel computer visualguidance system of the present invention may be used to guidedebridement in joints other than the hip joint (e.g., to guidedebridement of a surface of a humerus in order to prepare that surfacefor re-attachment of a torn rotator cuff, or to guide debridement of asurface of a bone in spinal surgery, etc.).

And by way of additional example but not limitation, the novel computervisual guidance system of the present invention may be used innon-arthroscopic procedures.

Modifications of the Preferred Embodiments

It should be understood that many additional changes in the details,materials, steps and arrangements of parts, which have been hereindescribed and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the presentinvention, may be made by those skilled in the art while still remainingwithin the principles and scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer visual guidance system for guiding asurgeon through an arthroscopic removal of bone, wherein the computervisual guidance system comprises an electronic communication interface,a display, and at least one processor that is configured to: receive, bythe electronic communication interface, a 2D image of the bone from anintra-operative imaging device; (ii) automatically analyze, by theprocessor, the 2D image so as to determine at least one measurement withrespect to the bone; (iii) automatically annotate, by the processor, the2D image with at least one annotation relating to the at least onemeasurement determined with respect to the bone so as to create anannotated 2D image; (iv) display, by the display, the annotated 2D imageto the surgeon so as to guide the surgeon through the arthroscopicremoval of the bone; (v) receive a new intra-operative 2D image, fromthe intra-operative imaging device, showing partial removal of the bone;(vi) automatically analyze, by the processor, the new intra-operative 2Dimage so as to determine at least one measurement with respect to thebone; (vii) automatically annotate, by the processor, the newintra-operative 2D image with at least one annotation relating to the atleast one measurement determined with respect to the bone so as tocreate a new annotated 2D image; and (viii) display, by the display, inreal-time the annotated new 2D image to the surgeon so as to guide thesurgeon through the arthroscopic removal of the bone.
 2. The computervisual guidance system of claim 1, wherein the intra-operative imagingdevice comprises an intra-operative X-ray device.
 3. The computer visualguidance system of claim 1, wherein the computer visual guidance systemis configured to be used iteratively during the arthroscopic removal ofthe bone.
 4. The computer visual guidance system of claim 1, wherein theat least one annotation comprises a first resection line for indicatinga proposed resection of the bone.
 5. The computer visual guidance systemof claim 4, wherein the at least one annotation comprises a secondresection line for indicating a smooth transition between the proposedresection of the bone and an adjacent portion of bone.
 6. The computervisual guidance system of claim 1, wherein the computer visual guidancesystem further comprises an input device, and wherein the system isconfigured to: detect, by the input device, an input from the surgeonindicating an adjustment to at least one annotation; in response todetecting the input, generate, by the processor, a surgeon-adjustedannotated 2D image; and display, by the display, the surgeon-adjustedannotated 2D image.
 7. The computer visual guidance system of claim 1,wherein the computer visual guidance system comprises a general purposecomputer having input and output functionality.
 8. The computer visualguidance system of claim 7, wherein the computer visual guidance systemcomprises a touchscreen tablet.
 9. The computer visual guidance systemof claim 8, wherein the touchscreen tablet is located in the sterilefield and covered by a sterile drape.
 10. The computer visual guidancesystem of claim 1, wherein the computer visual guidance system isconfigured to guide the surgeon through the arthroscopic removal of thebone in order to treat cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.
 11. Thecomputer visual guidance system of claim 10, wherein the bone comprisesa cam pathology, and further wherein the computer visual guidance systemis configured to automatically analyze, by the processor, the 2D imageso as to determine at least one measurement with respect to the campathology and automatically annotate the 2D image with at least oneannotation relating to the at least one measurement determined withrespect to the cam pathology.
 12. The computer visual guidance system ofclaim 11, wherein the at least one measurement determined with respectto the cam pathology comprises an Alpha Angle measurement, and furtherwherein annotating the 2D image with at least one annotation relating tothe at least one measurement determined with respect to the campathology comprises adding an Alpha Angle line to the 2D image.
 13. Thecomputer visual guidance system of claim 12, wherein the computer visualguidance system is configured to determine the Alpha Angle measurementby: determining a line which originates at the center of the femoralhead and extends through the middle of the femoral neck; determining asecond line which originates at the center of the femoral head andpasses through the location which signifies the start of the campathology; and calculating the angle between the two lines.
 14. Thecomputer visual guidance system of claim 12, wherein annotating the 2Dimage with at least one annotation relating to the at least onemeasurement determined with respect to the cam pathology comprisesinserting a target Alpha Angle line into the 2D image.
 15. The computervisual guidance system of claim 14, wherein the at least one annotationcomprises a first resection line for indicating a proposed resection ofthe cam pathology and a second resection line for indicating a smoothtransition between the proposed resection of the cam pathology andadjacent bone.
 16. The computer visual guidance system of claim 15,wherein the first resection line starts at the Alpha Angle line and endsat the target Alpha Angle line, and the second resection line starts atthe end of the first resection line and extends down the femoral neck.17. The computer visual guidance system of claim 1, wherein the at leastone annotation comprises: a circle inscribing the femoral head; acenterpoint of the circle inscribing the femoral head; a lineoriginating at the center of the femoral head and extending along thecenterline of the femoral neck; an Alpha Angle line originating at thecenter of the femoral head and passing through the location at the startof the cam pathology; a line showing the target Alpha Angle; and aresection curve.
 18. The computer visual guidance system of claim 17,wherein the computer visual guidance system further comprises an inputdevice, and wherein the system is configured to: detect, by the inputdevice, an input from the surgeon indicating an adjustment to at leastone annotation; in response to detecting the input, generate, by theprocessor, a surgeon-adjusted annotated 2D image; and display, by thedisplay, the surgeon-adjusted annotated 2D image.
 19. The computervisual guidance system of claim 18, wherein the display and the inputdevice form a touchscreen device, and further wherein the inputindicating an adjustment to at least one annotation is detected on thedisplay of the touchscreen device.
 20. The computer visual guidancesystem of claim 1, wherein the computer visual guidance system isconfigured to guide the surgeon through the arthroscopic removal of thebone in order to treat pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement.
 21. Thecomputer visual guidance system of claim 20, wherein the bone comprisesa pincer pathology, and further wherein the computer visual guidancesystem is configured to automatically analyze, by the processor, the 2Dimage so as to determine at least one measurement with respect to thepincer pathology and automatically annotate the 2D image with at leastone annotation relating to the at least one measurement determined withrespect to the pincer pathology.
 22. The computer visual guidance systemof claim 21, wherein the at least one measurement determined withrespect to the pincer pathology comprises a Center Edge Anglemeasurement, and further wherein annotating the 2D image with at leastone annotation relating to the at least one measurement determined withrespect to the pincer pathology comprises inserting a Center Edge Angleline into the 2D image.
 23. The computer visual guidance system of claim22, wherein annotating the 2D image with at least one annotationrelating to the at least one measurement determined with respect to thepincer pathology comprises inserting a target Center Edge Angle lineinto the 2D image.
 24. The computer visual guidance system of claim 23,wherein the computer visual guidance system is configured to determinethe Center Edge Angle by: determining a vertical line which originatesat the center of the femoral head; determining a second line whichoriginates at the center of the femoral head and passes through thelocation which signifies the start of the pincer pathology; andcalculating the angle between the two lines.
 25. A method for guiding asurgeon through an arthroscopic debridement of a bone, the methodperformed at a computer visual guidance system comprising an electroniccommunication interface, a display, and at least one processor, themethod comprising: receiving, by the electronic communication interface,a 2D image of the bone from an intra-operative imaging device; (ii)automatically analyzing, by the processor, the 2D image so as todetermine at least one measurement with respect to the bone; (iii)automatically annotating, by the processor, the 2D image with at leastone annotation relating to the at least one measurement determined withrespect to the bone so as to create an annotated 2D image; (iv)displaying, by the display, the annotated 2D image to the surgeon so asto guide the surgeon through the arthroscopic removal of the bone; (v)receive a new intra-operative 2D image, from the intra-operative imagingdevice, showing partial removal of the bone; (vi) automatically analyze,by the processor, the new intra-operative 2D image so as to determine atleast one measurement with respect to the bone; (vii) automaticallyannotate, by the processor, the new intra-operative 2D image with atleast one annotation relating to the at least one measurement determinedwith respect to the bone so as to create a new annotated 2D image; and(viii) display, by the display, in real time the annotated new 2D imageto the surgeon so as to guide the surgeon through the arthroscopicremoval of the bone.
 26. The method of claim 25, comprising using thecomputer visual guidance system iteratively during the arthroscopicremoval of the bone.
 27. The method of claim 26, comprisingautomatically creating, by the processor, a new annotated 2D image uponreceiving a new 2D image.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the boneis moved relative to the intra-operative imaging device before thecomputer visual guidance system receives the new 2D image.
 29. Themethod of claim 27, wherein the intra-operative imaging device is movedbefore the computer visual guidance system receives the new 2D image.